4.8 Article

Synergistic Effects of Double Cation Substitution in Solution-Processed CZTS Solar Cells with over 10% Efficiency

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 32, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201802540

Keywords

CZTS; defects; kesterites; photovoltaics; solar cells

Funding

  1. CREATE Programme under the Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) - National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore
  2. Ministry of Education (MOE) Tier 2 Project [MOE2016-T2-1-030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of many emerging compound semiconductors for thin-film solar cells is considerably lower than the Shockley-Queisser limit, and one of the main reasons for this is the presence of various deleterious defects. A partial or complete substitution of the cations presents a viable strategy to alter the characteristics of the detrimental defects and defect clusters. Particularly, it is hypothesized that double cation substitution could be a feasible strategy to mitigate the negative effects of different types of defects. In this study, the effects of double cation substitution on pure-sulfide Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) by partially substituting Cu with Ag, and Zn with Cd are explored. A 10.1% total-area power conversion efficiency (10.8% active-area efficiency) is achieved. The role of Cd, Ag, and Cd + Ag substitution is probed using temperature-dependent photoluminescence, time-resolved photoluminescence, current-voltage (IV), and external quantum efficiency (EQE) measurements. It is found that Cd improves the photovoltaic performance by altering the defect characteristics of acceptor states near the valence band, and Ag reduces nonradiative bulk recombination. It is believed that the double cation substitution approach can also be extended to other emerging photovoltaic materials, where defects are the main culprits for low performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available