4.8 Article

Frogspawn-Coral-Like Hollow Sodium Sulfide Nanostructured Cathode for High-Rate Performance Sodium-Sulfur Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201803251

Keywords

frogspawn coral structure; high-rate performance; hollow nanospheres; passivated sodium metal; sodium sulfide

Funding

  1. Young Investigator Program - US Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-17-1-0184]
  2. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Room-temperature (RT) sodium-sulfur (Na-S) batteries are attractive cost-effective platforms as the next-generation energy storage systems by using all earth-abundant resources as electrode materials. However, the slow kinetics of Na-S chemistry makes it hard to achieve high-rate performance. Herein, a facile and scalable approach has been developed to synthesize hollow sodium sulfide (Na2S) nanospheres embedded in a highly hierarchical and spongy conductive carbon matrix, forming an intriguing architecture similar to the morphology of frogspawn coral, which has shown great potential as a cathode for high-rate performance RT Na-S batteries. The shortened Na-ion diffusion pathway benefits from the hollow structures together with the fast electron transfer from the carbon matrix contributes to high electrochemical reactivity, leading to superior electrochemical performance at various current rates. At high current densities of 1.4 and 2.1 A g(-1), high initial discharge capacities of 980 and 790 mAh g(sulfur)(-1) can be achieved, respectively, with reversible capacities stabilized at 600 and 400 mAh g(sulfur)(-1) after 100 cycles. As a proof of concept, a Na-metal-free Na-S battery is demonstrated by pairing the hollow Na2S cathode with tin-based anode. This work provides guidance on rational materials design towards the success of RT high-rate Na-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available