4.8 Article

Atomic Sn4+ Decorated into Vanadium Carbide MXene Interlayers for Superior Lithium Storage

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201802977

Keywords

atomic ion intercalation; ex situ study; layered materials; Li-ion storage; operando spectroscopic study

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2017YFA0303500]
  3. NSFC [U1532112, 11574280, 11605201, 21727801]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2310000074]
  5. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1708085QB27]
  6. CAS Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-SLH018]
  7. CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team
  8. Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education) Nankai University (111 project) [B12015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ion intercalation is an important way to improve the energy storage performance of 2D materials. The dynamic energy storage process in such layered intercalations is important but still a challenge mainly due to the lack of effective operando methods. Herein, a unique atomic Sn4+-decorated vanadium carbide (V2C) MXene not only exhibiting highly enhanced lithium-ion battery (LIB) performance, but also possessing outstanding rate and cyclic stability because of the expanded interlayer space and the formation of V-O-Sn bonding is demonstrated. In combination with ex situ tests, an operando X-ray absorption fine structure measurement is developed to explore the dynamic mechanism of V2C@Sn MXene electrodes in LIBs. The results clearly reveal the valence changes of vanadium (V), tin (Sn), and positive contribution of oxygen (O) atoms during the charging/discharging process, confirming their contribution for lithium storage capacity. The stability of intercalated MXene electrode is further in situ studied to prove the key role of V-O-Sn bonding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available