4.8 Article

Decoding the intensity of sensory input by two glutamate receptors in one C-elegans interneuron

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06819-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0500200, 2017YFA0505300, 2016YFA0502400]
  2. National Foundation of Natural Science of China [31730054, 31771113, 31271180, 31471023]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Funds of China [LR14C090001]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2017FZA7003, 2018FZA7004]
  5. Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2017PT31038, 2018PT31041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How neurons are capable of decoding stimulus intensity and translate this information into complex behavioral outputs is poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate that the C. elegans interneuron AIB regulates two types of behaviors: reversal initiation and feeding suppression in response to different concentrations of quinine. Low concentrations of quinine are decoded in AIB by a low-threshold, fast-inactivation glutamate receptor GLR-1 and translated into reversal initiation. In contrast, high concentrations of quinine are decoded by a high-threshold, slow-inactivation glutamate receptor GLR-5 in AIB. After activation, GLR-5 evokes sustained Ca2+ release from the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3)-sensitive Ca2+ stores and triggers neuropeptide secretion, which in turn activates the downstream neuron RIM and inhibits feeding. Our results reveal that distinct signal patterns in a single interneuron AIB can encode differential behavioral outputs depending on the stimulus intensity, thus highlighting the importance of functional mapping of information propagation at the single-neuron level during connectome construction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available