4.8 Article

Neural representation of visual concepts in people born blind

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07574-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500882, 31671128]
  2. Societa Scienze Mente Cervello-Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Trento e Rovereto
  3. Provincia Autonoma di Trento
  4. Harvard Provostial postdoctoral fund
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [654837]
  6. Israel National Postdoctoral Award Program for Advancing Women in Science
  7. National Program for Special Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  8. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017XTCX04]
  9. Interdisciplinary Research Funds of Beijing Normal University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How do we represent information without sensory features? How are abstract concepts like freedom, devoid of external perceptible referents, represented in the brain? Here, to address the role of sensory information in the neural representation of concepts, we used fMRI to investigate how people born blind process concepts whose referents are imperceptible to them because of their visual nature (rainbow, red). Activity for these concepts was compared to that of sensorially-perceptible referents (rain), classical abstract concepts (justice) and concrete concepts (cup), providing a gradient between fully concrete and fully abstract concepts in the blind. We find that anterior temporal lobe (ATL) responses track concept perceptibility and objecthood: preference for imperceptible object concepts was found in dorsal ATL, for abstract (non-object, non-referential) concepts in lateral ATL, and for perceptible concepts in medial ATL. These findings point to a new division-of-labor among aspects of ATL in representing conceptual properties that are abstract in different ways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available