4.8 Article

A majority of HIV persistence during antiretroviral therapy is due to infected cell proliferation

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06843-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Washington Research Foundation (WRF) Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH [KL2 TR002317]
  3. Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) [1U19AI096109, 1UM1AI126611-01]
  4. Australian Centre for HIV and Hepatitis Virology Research (ACH2)
  5. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [AAP1061681]
  6. NIH [P01 AI030371-24, U19 AI113173-02, R01 AI121129-01, UM1 AI126623, UM1 AI068635]
  7. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [KL2TR002317, TL1TR002318] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [UM1AI126623, UM1AI126611, U19AI096109, UM1AI068635, R01AI121129, P30AI027757, U19AI113173, T32AI007044] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) suppresses viral replication in people living with HIV. Yet, infected cells persist for decades on ART and viremia returns if ART is stopped. Persistence has been attributed to viral replication in an ART sanctuary and long-lived and/or proliferating latently infected cells. Using ecological methods and existing data, we infer that >99% of infected cells are members of clonal populations after one year of ART. We reconcile our results with observations from the first months of ART, demonstrating mathematically how a fossil record of historic HIV replication permits observed viral evolution even while most new infected cells arise from proliferation. Together, our results imply cellular proliferation generates a majority of infected cells during ART. Therefore, reducing proliferation could decrease the size of the HIV reservoir and help achieve a functional cure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available