4.8 Article

A CRISPR-Cas9-triggered strand displacement amplification method for ultrasensitive DNA detection

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07324-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31600595]
  2. International Cooperation Project for Science and Research Plan of Shenzhen [GJHZ20160229195805334]
  3. Frontier Science Key Programs of Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSWSLH034]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Funding [JCYJ20160429190215470]
  5. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2015-345]
  6. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) General Research Funds (GRF) [CityU 11301215, 11205617]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most widely used method for DNA amplification, the requirement of thermocycling limits its non-laboratory applications. Isothermal DNA amplification techniques are hence valuable for on-site diagnostic applications in place of traditional PCR. Here we describe a true isothermal approach for amplifying and detecting double-stranded DNA based on a CRISPR-Cas9-triggered nicking endonuclease-mediated Strand Displacement Amplification method (namely CRISDA). CRISDA takes advantage of the high sensitivity/specificity and unique conformational rearrangements of CRISPR effectors in recognizing the target DNA. In combination with a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) invasion-mediated endpoint measurement, the method exhibits attomolar sensitivity and single-nucleotide specificity in detection of various DNA targets under a complex sample background. Additionally, by integrating the technique with a Cas9-mediated target enrichment approach, CRISDA exhibits sub-attomolar sensitivity. In summary, CRISDA is a powerful isothermal tool for ultrasensitive and specific detection of nucleic acids in point-of-care diagnostics and field analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available