4.2 Review

Progress Toward the Elusive Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine

Journal

SURGICAL INFECTIONS
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 757-768

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2018.233

Keywords

active immunity; adaptive immunity; passive immunity; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; T(H)17; vaccine

Funding

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [PRIEBE17G0]
  2. Richard A. and Susan F. Smith President's Innovation Award
  3. Technology and Innovation Development Office (TIDO) at Boston Children's Hospital
  4. Translational Research for Infection Prevention in Pediatric Anesthesia and CriticalCare (TRIPPACC) Program of the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine at Boston Children's Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The gram-negative bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes a wide range of infections, mostly in hospitalized and immunocompromised patients, those with burns, surgical wounds, or combat-related wounds, and in people with cystic fibrosis. The increasing antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa confers a pressing need for vaccines, yet there are no P. aeruginosa vaccines approved for human use, and recent promising candidates have failed in large clinical trials. Discussion: In this review, we summarize recent clinical trials and pre-clinical studies of P. aeruginosa vaccines and provide a suggested framework for the makeup of a future successful vaccine. Murine models of infection suggest that antibodies, specifically opsonophagocytic killing antibodies (OPK), antitoxin antibodies, and anti-attachment antibodies, combined with T cell immunity, specifically T(H)17 responses, are needed for broad and potent protection against P. aeruginosa infection. A better understanding of the human immune response to P. aeruginosa infections, and to vaccine candidates, will eventually pave the way to a successful vaccine for this wily pathogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available