4.4 Review

Effectiveness of contrast-associated acute kidney injury prevention methods; a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Journal

BMC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1113-0

Keywords

Contrast induced acute kidney injury; Contrast nephropathy; Prevention methods; Contrast associated acute kidney injury

Funding

  1. National University of Ireland Galway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundDifferent methods to prevent contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) have been proposed in recent years. We performed a mixed treatment comparison to evaluate and rank suggested interventions.MethodsA comprehensive Systematic review and a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was completed. Results were tabulated and graphically represented using a network diagram; forest plots and league tables were shown to rank treatments by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A stacked bar chart rankogram was generated. We performed main analysis with 200 RCTs and three analyses according to contrast media and high or normal baseline renal profile that includes 173, 112 & 60 RCTs respectively.ResultsWe have included 200 trials with 42,273 patients and 44 interventions. The primary outcome was CI-AKI, defined as 25% relative increase or0.5mg/dl increase from baseline creatinine one to 5 days post contrast exposure. The top ranked interventions through different analyses were Allopurinol, Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) & Oxygen (0.9647, 0.7809 & 0.7527 in the main analysis). Comparatively, reference treatment intravenous hydration was ranked lower but better than Placebo (0.3124 VS 0.2694 in the main analysis).ConclusionMultiple CA-AKI preventive interventions have been tested in RCTs. This network evaluates data for all the explored options. The results suggest that some options (particularly allopurinol, PGE1 & Oxygen) deserve further evaluation in a larger well-designed RCTs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available