4.6 Article

Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Mortality in Asymptomatic and Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 38-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.029

Keywords

aortic stenosis; conservative management; left ventricular ejection fraction; mortality; prognosis; surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine the best left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoff value to predict long-term mortality in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) and LVEF >= 50% under conservative management and after surgical correction of AS. BACKGROUND Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a Class I indication in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and LVEF <50%. However, this is an uncommon situation in asymptomatic severe AS (<1% of patients), usually occurring late in the course of the disease. No data are available concerning the prognostic value of LVEF in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic AS patients with preserved LVEF (>= 50%) in order to identify a LVEF threshold value associated with increased mortality. METHODS This analysis included 1,678 patients with preserved LVEF and no or minimal symptoms, with a diagnosis of severe AS. The population was divided into 3 groups: LVEF <55%, LVEF 55% to 59%, and LVEF >= 60%. RESULTS Five-year survival rate was 72 +/- 2% for patients with LVEF >= 60%, 74 +/- 2% for patients with LVEF between 55% and 59%, and 59 +/- 4% for patients with LVEF <55% (p < 0.001). Under initially conservative or initially surgical management (surgery within 3 months after baseline echocardiography), patients with LVEF <55% displayed significant excess mortality compared to patients with LVEF >= 60% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.44 [95% confidence interval: 1.51 to 3.94]; p < 0.001 and 2.51 [95% confidence interval: 1.58 to4.00]; p < 0.001, respectively), whereas patients with LVEF between 55% and 59% had comparable prognosis to those with LVEF >= 60% (p = 0.53 and p = 0.36, respectively). In patients with LVEF <55%, initial conservative management was associated with increased mortality compared to initial surgical management, even after covariate adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.70 [95% confidence interval: 1.98 to 3.67]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe AS, preserved LVEF and no or minimal symptoms at the time of diagnosis, LVEF <55% is a marker of poor outcome, with medical or surgical management suggesting that these patients should be considered for surgery before this stage. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available