4.6 Article

Microvascular Dysfunction in Dilated Cardiomyopathy A Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1699-1708

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.032

Keywords

cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; dilated cardiomyopathy; microvascular dysfunction; myocardial blood flow; myocardial perfusion imaging

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  2. Imperial College, London, England
  3. Intramural Research Program of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  4. National Institutes of Health [HL 006137-07]
  5. National Institute for Health Research
  6. CORDA
  7. Rosetrees Trust
  8. Heart Cells Foundation
  9. Barts and the London Charity
  10. British Heart Foundation
  11. Siemens
  12. Alexander Jansons Foundation
  13. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [ZIAHL004607, ZIAHL006137] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study sought to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and examine the relationship between myocardial perfusion and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling. BACKGROUND Although regarded as a nonischemic condition, DCM has been associated with microvascular dysfunction, which is postulated to play a role in its pathogenesis. However, the relationship of the resulting perfusion abnormalities to myocardial fibrosis and the degree of LV remodeling is unclear. METHODS A total of 65 patients and 35 healthy control subjects underwent adenosine (140 mu g/kg/min) stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement imaging. Stress and rest MBF and MPR were derived using a modified Fermi-constrained deconvolution algorithm. RESULTS Patients had significantly higher global rest MBF compared with control subjects (1.73 +/- 0.42 ml/g/min vs. 1.14 +/- 0.42 ml/g/min; p < 0.001). In contrast, global stress MBF was significantly lower versus control subjects (3.07 +/- 1.02 ml/g/min vs. 3.53 +/- 0.79 ml/g/min; p = 0.02), resulting in impaired MPR in the DCM group (1.83 +/- 0.58 vs. 3.50 +/- 1.45; p < 0.001). Global stress MBF (2.70 +/- 0.89 ml/g/min vs. 3.44 +/- 1.03 ml/g/min; p = 0.017) and global MPR (1.67 +/- 0.61 vs. 1.99 +/- 0.50; p = 0.047) were significantly reduced in patients with DCM with LV ejection fraction <= 35% compared with those with LV ejection fraction >35%. Segments with fibrosis had lower rest MBF (mean difference: -0.12 ml/g/min; 95% confidence interval: -0.23 to -0.01 ml/g/min; p = 0.035) and lower stress MBF (mean difference: -0.15 ml/g/min; 95% confidence interval: -0.28 to -0.03 ml/g/min; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS Patients with DCM exhibit microvascular dysfunction, the severity of which is associated with the degree of LV impairment. However, rest MBF is elevated rather than reduced in DCM. If microvascular dysfunction contributes to the pathogenesis of DCM, then the underlying mechanism is more likely to involve stress-induced repetitive stunning rather than chronic myocardial hypoperfusion. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available