4.7 Article

Integration of a Levee Breach Erosion Model in a GPU-Accelerated 2D Shallow Water Equations Code

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 682-702

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018WR023826

Keywords

erosion; finite volume; flood simulation; GPU; levee breach; shallow water equations

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, University and Research (Italy), under the Scientific Independence of young Researchers program [RBSI14R1GP, D92I15000190001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a two-dimensional shallow water equations code coupled with a physically based erosion model, able to predict the opening and evolution of breaches forming in levees built with either cohesive or noncohesive material. The bottom elevation change is evaluated using an excess shear-stress equation, which accounts for the hydrodynamic conditions and for the material characteristics. The proposed model modifies the local topography at runtime wherever the levee is overtopped without having to predefine the position and shape of the breach. The model is implemented in CUDA programming language, so that simulations can be run on graphics processing units, guaranteeing fast execution times even for high-resolution meshes and large domains. The validation is performed based on several experimental tests, and numerical predictions are in good agreement with the measurements. The strengths and weaknesses of the proposed approach are also discussed by comparison with a sediment transport model based on the Exner equation: While the latter gives good results only for breaches forming in levees built with noncohesive material, the proposed model can also be applied to cohesive embankments. The application to a historical flood event is also presented, showing that the model can effectively be employed for real field simulations also in the case of multiple breaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available