4.8 Article

Fractional removal of manganese and ammonia nitrogen from electrolytic metal manganese residue leachate using carbonate and struvite precipitation

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages 229-238

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.044

Keywords

Electrolytic metal manganese residue leachate; Manganese; Ammonia nitrogen; Carbonate; Struvite precipitation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China-China [21806132]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1903503, 2018YFC1903506]
  3. 'Sichuan Province Science and Technology plan Key Research and Development' [19ZDYF0911]
  4. 'State Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Reuse for Building Materials' [SWR-2017-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative investigation of hydroxide precipitation, sulfide precipitation, carbonate precipitation and the struvite formation process for removing manganese and ammonia nitrogen from electrolytic metal manganese residue leachate (EMMRL) was investigated. Chemical equilibrium model-Visual MINTEQ was applied to simulate the chemical reactions and optimize chemical dosages in manganese and ammonia nitrogen removal. Phase transition, morphology, and valence state of the precipitates were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). Results indicated that carbonate precipitation prior to the other two methods for removal of manganese and ammonia nitrogen. The removal efficiency of manganese was 99.9%, when molar ratio of C to Mn was 1.1:1 at pH 9.5, and manganese was removed in the form of MnCO3. When molar ratio of P to N was 1.1:1 at pH 9.5, the removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen was 97.4%, and ammonia nitrogen was removed in the form of struvite. Economic evaluation reveals that the treatment cost was 9.316 $ m(-3) when carbonate and phosphate was used to remove manganese and ammonia nitrogen from EMMRL. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available