3.9 Article

Chemical and fermentative characteristics of agricultural byproducts and their mixtures with roughages incubated with rumen fluid from slaughtered dromedaries

Journal

TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 590-599

Publisher

SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEY-TUBITAK
DOI: 10.3906/vet-1803-20

Keywords

Agro-industrial byproducts; buffering capacity; Camelus dromedaries; fibrous forages; in vitro gas production; ruminal inoculum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In pursuit of novel strategies aimed to promote animal production while exploiting agricultural residues, using the dromedary camel rumen fluid degradation capabilities combined with a gas production (GP) technique approach, we investigated the in vitro kinetic parameters and some physical and chemical characteristics of three agro-industrial byproducts (AIBP) and their mixtures with three roughages. Chemical composition, buffering capacity, apparent degradability, pH, and in vitro GP kinetic parameters were evaluated for citrus pulp, tomato peels, apple pomace, their mixtures (50:50 % DM basis) with milk thistle, crown daisy, and polyphyte hay. GP of AIBP ranged from 200 to 240 mL/g DM. Roughages produced significantly less gas whereas mixtures gave intermediate amounts of gas. Gas from AIBP evolved with significantly (P < 0.05) shorter lag time (0.33 h) compared with roughages and mixtures. Mixing roughages with AIBP significantly (P < 0.05) increased the initial and final pH. The buffering capacity significantly increased with some mixtures and decreased with some others. In conclusion, ruminal fluid from slaughtered dromedaries, like the conventional bovine inoculum, fermented the major plant polymers and can be used in in vitro degradability trials. Rapidly fermentable AIPB mixed with roughages can improve some nutritional aspects, providing dietary fiber and correcting some in vitro kinetic parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available