Journal
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 154-166Publisher
CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- European Union (EU) FP7 project LIBERATION [311781]
- Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [841.11.001, 870.15.030, 040.11.577]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
There is worldwide concern about the environmental costs of conventional intensification of agriculture. Growing evidence suggests that ecological intensification of mainstream farming can safeguard food production, with accompanying environmental benefits; however, the approach is rarely adopted by farmers. Our review of the evidence for replacing external inputs with ecosystem services shows that scientists tend to focus on processes (e.g., pollination) rather than outcomes (e.g., profits), and express benefits at spatio-temporal scales that are not always relevant to farmers. This results in mismatches in perceived benefits of ecological intensification between scientists and farmers, which hinders its uptake. We provide recommendations for overcoming these mismatches and highlight important additional factors driving uptake of nature based management practices, such as social acceptability of farming.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available