4.7 Article

Mechanical performance of hexagonal multi-cell concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) stub columns under axial compression

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 71-83

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.027

Keywords

Concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST); Hexagonal multi-cell; Axial compression; Finite element analysis (FEA); Full-range analysis; Ultimate strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51678341]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-cell concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) column is a type of composite members developing from conventional CFST columns. Featuring greater cross-sectional dimensions and the use of internal webs to separate inner concrete into smaller isolated cells, multi-cell CFST columns have been used in super high-rise buildings recently as the main vertical load bearing members. However, existing research on CFST members is mainly focused on conventional single-cell CFST members. To fill this research gap, this paper numerically investigates the mechanical performance of hexagonal multi-cell CFST stub columns under axial compression. A finite element analysis (FEA) model was initially established to simulate the mechanical performance of hexagonal multi cell CFST columns. The FEA model was validated against existing experimental data. The mechanical performance of the multi-cell CFST columns were analysed, including the full-range load versus deformation relationships, the stress distributions of the main components and the distribution of contact stress on each concrete cell. A parametric study was then conducted to investigate the sensitivity of various geometric and material parameters on the compressive behaviour of multi-cell CFST columns. Finally, analytical formulae were derived to predict the axial compressive ultimate strength of hexagonal multi-cell CFST columns. The methods were found to be acceptable with reasonably good accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available