Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors with advanced histology

BackgroundColorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are large, flat neoplasms that are usually treated using different endoscopic techniques based on their morphology, size, and histology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of LSTs with advanced histology treated by endoscopic resection.MethodsA total of 246 LSTs with advanced histology [i.e., high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and adenocarcinoma (AC)] treated by endoscopic resection [i.e., endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), EMR-precutting (EMR-P), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)] were enrolled. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected by review of patient's medical records.ResultsThe en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 75.6% and 85.0%, respectively. The bleeding and perforation rates were 10.2% and 2.4%, respectively. The frequency of cancerous pit pattern and bleeding was significantly higher in LSTs with AC than in LSTs with HGD. The R0 resection rate in LSTs with HGD was significantly higher than that in LSTs with AC. The frequency of cancerous pit patterns in LST cases with submucosal AC was significantly higher than those with intramucosal AC. The mean size of the LSTs was significantly larger in ESD group than in EMR or EMR-P groups. The frequencies of nodular mixed subtype, cancerous pit patterns, and en bloc resection rates were significantly higher in the ESD group than in the EMR or EMR-P groups. However, the frequency of perforation was significantly higher in EMR-P group than in EMR or ESD groups.ConclusionsThese results indicate that ESD is a more acceptable treatment approach for resection of colorectal LSTs of larger size, with nodular mixed subtype, having a cancerous pit pattern or AC, using either en bloc or curative resection methods, compared to EMR or EMR-P procedures.