4.5 Article

Digital mapping of soil salinity at various depths using an EM38

Journal

SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 232-244

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sum.12468

Keywords

Electrical Conductivity Sampling Assessment and Prediction; EM-38; ordinary kriging; soil salinity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Problem definition Spatial information on salinity is required at the farm level to enable suitable soil, crop and water management practices. Rationale To facilitate this, we used an electromagnetic (EM) induction instrument for rapid measurement of apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa-mS m(-1)) across the 11 ha area of the Central Soil Salinity Research Institute experimental farm in Nain, Haryana, India. Methods The ECa was measured using an EM38 in horizontal (ECah) and vertical (ECav) modes on a grid survey. Using the ECa data, we selected 21 locations using the response surface sampling design (RSSD) module of Electrical Conductivity Sampling Assessment and Prediction (ESAP) software. We collected soil samples at four depth increments, including two topsoil (0-0.15 and 0.15-0.30 m), a subsurface (0.3-0.6m) and a subsoil (0.6-0.9m) and measured the soil electrical conductivity (ECe-dS m(-1)). Results We developed multiple linear regression to predict ECe using the ESAP software from ECah and ECav and two trend surface parameters (i.e., Easting and Northing) across the farm. The prediction accuracy and bias were compared at different depth increments, and results of the spatial distributions of ECe using ordinary kriging (OK) interpolation were described in terms of the crop and soil use and management implications. Conclusions We conclude the overall approach allows for generations of a digital soil maps (DSMs) of ECe which serve as baseline data that will allow the monitoring of any rehabilitation effort of salt-affected soils according to their actual degree of salinity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available