Journal
SHOCK WAVES
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 705-716Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-018-0883-4
Keywords
Numerical fluxes; Artificial dissipation; Upwind scheme; AUSM(+)-up scheme; Turbine cascade; Secondary flows
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this paper, the AUSM(+)-up scheme is compared to other numerical flux schemes in the framework of a RANS/URANS code for turbomachinery applications. The considered advection schemes include central discretizations with artificial dissipation and the Roe upwind scheme. The comparison is carried out by studying a low-aspect-ratio turbine cascade over a wide range of expansion ratios that encompasses almost incompressible up to supersonic flow conditions. It is found that the dissipation scaling associated with the AUSM(+)-up scheme was effective over the whole range of analysed flow conditions. A detailed assessment with the aid of the available measurements will be exploited to show how the AUSM(+)-up is capable of a detailed and faithful reproduction of secondary flow features, with accuracy comparable to that of the Roe scheme and superior to that of central schemes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available