4.6 Article

An Incentive Mechanism in Mobile Crowdsourcing Based on Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s18103453

Keywords

multi-attribute reverse auction; malicious competition; dynamic threshold; crowdsourcing; online incentive mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61502410, 61572418, 61602399, 61702439]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622691]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1704287, 1252292, 1741277]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2014FQ026, ZR2016FM42]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to avoid malicious competition and select high quality crowd workers to improve the utility of crowdsourcing system, this paper proposes an incentive mechanism based on the combination of reverse auction and multi-attribute auction in mobile crowdsourcing. The proposed online incentive mechanism includes two algorithms. One is the crowd worker selection algorithm based on multi-attribute reverse auction that adopts dynamic threshold to make an online decision for whether accept a crowd worker according to its attributes. Another is the payment determination algorithm which determines payment for a crowd worker based on its reputation and quality of sensing data, that is, a crowd worker can get payment equal to the bidding price before performing task only if his reputation reaches good reputation threshold, otherwise he will get payment based on his data sensing quality. We prove that our proposed online incentive mechanism has the properties of computational efficiency, individual rationality, budget-balance, truthfulness and honesty. Through simulations, the efficiency of our proposed online incentive mechanism is verified which can improve the efficiency, adaptability and trust degree of the mobile crowdsourcing system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available