4.7 Article

Energy use and economic analysis for wheat production by conservation tillage along with sprinkler irrigation

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 648, Issue -, Pages 450-459

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.170

Keywords

Benefit-cost ratio; Direct energy; Economic analysis; Energy productivity; Renewable energy; Sustainable agriculture

Funding

  1. AREEO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to investigate the combination of both sprinkler irrigation and conservation tillage in sustainable agriculture for wheat production. To exploit the advantages of the two systems, conventional tillage along with surface irrigation (T-1) and conservation tillage along with sprinkler irrigation (T-2) were compared based on energy indices and economic analysis. The study was carried out for two years of 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 in a semi-arid environment located at the northwest of Iran. Results revealed that the total average energy consumed was 16.36 and 14.07 GJ ha(-1) for T-1 and T-2, respectively. The total energy input components of indirect and non-renewable were 65.3% (54.9%) and 76.0% (62.9%) for T-1 (and T-2). Energy inputs of diesel, nitrogen fertilizer and seeds were prime energy consuming components. In T-2, the sprinkler irrigation was another energy consumption input. The highest net energy gain (109.25 GJ ha(-1)), energy use efficiency (5.53), energy productivity (382.00 kg GJ(-1)) and energy profitability (8.50) and the lowest specific energy (3.36 MJ kg(-1 ) were found in T-2. As well as the highest net return (1821.08 US$ ha(-1)), a benefit-cost ratio (4.4) and productivity (9.33 kg US$(-1)) was obtained in T-2. Therefore, application of conservation tillage along with sprinkler irrigation could be suggested as a promising combination for wheat production in a semi-arid environment. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available