4.7 Article

Concentrations and tissue-specific distributions of organic ultraviolet absorbents in wild fish from a large subtropical lake in China

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 647, Issue -, Pages 1305-1313

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.117

Keywords

Organic ultraviolet absorbents; Bioconcentration; Tissue distribution; Fish; Lake

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic ultraviolet absorbents (UVAs) have been detected in various materials and biota, but little is known about the distributions of UVAs in the tissues of biota. In this study, tissue-specific UVA accumulation in six fish species from Lake Chaohu, China, was investigated. The sums of 12 UVA concentrations in muscles, gills, and livers were 7.65-120, 10.1-281, and 26.4-359 ng/g dry weight, respectively. Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, 4-methylbenzylidene-camphor, and 2-(2'-hydroxy-3',5'-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-chlorobenzotriazole were the dominant UVAs. Ethylhexyl salicylate and homosalate have been found in the aquatic species firstly. UVAs were taken up to different degrees by different fish species. The UVA muscle bioconcentration factors were lower than predicted by the Estimation Programs Interface Suite model, suggesting that such models may overestimate UVA accumulation in fish. The tissue distribution patterns indicated that UVAs are easily transferred to the muscles after being absorbed through the gills. The liver was found to preferentially accumulate UVAs and have a high UVA accumulation capacity, implying liver damage may be caused by UVAs. This is the first time the partitioning of UVAs between the liver, muscle, and gills of freshwater fish has been studied. The data acquired will improve our understanding of the pharmacokinetics and toxicities of UVAs in aquatic organisms. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available