4.7 Article

Exposure to ambient air pollution and risk of childhood cancers: A population-based study in Tehran, Iran

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 646, Issue -, Pages 105-110

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.219

Keywords

Air pollution; Childhood cancer; Tehran; PM10; NO2; SO2

Funding

  1. Institute for Environmental Research at Tehran University of Medical Sciences [91-03-46-18788]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between air pollution and childhood cancer is inconclusive. We investigated the associations between exposure to ambient air pollution and childhood cancers in Tehran, Iran. This project included children between 1 and 15 years-of-age with a cancer diagnosis by the Center for the Control of Non Communicable Disease (n = 161) during 2007 to 2009. Controls were selected randomly within the city using a Geographic Information System (GIS) (n = 761). The cases were geocoded based on exact home addresses. Air pollution exposure of cases and random controls were estimated by a previously developed Land Use Regression (LUR) model for the 2010 calendar year. The annual mean concentrations of Particulate Matter <= 10 mu m (PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) in the locations of cancer cases were 101.97 mu g/m(3), 49.42 ppb and 38.92 ppb respectively, while in the random control group, respective mean exposures were 98.63 mu g/m(3), 45.98 ppb and 38.95 ppb. A logistic regression model was used to find the probability of childhood cancer per unit increase in PM10, NO2 and SO2. We observed a positive association between exposures to PM10 with childhood cancers. We did, however, observe a positive, but not statistically significant association between NO2 exposure and childhood cancer. Our study is the first to highlight an association between air pollution exposure and childhood cancer risk in Iran, however these findings require replication through future studies. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available