4.7 Article

Hydrological and geochemical responses of fire in a shallow cave system

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 662, Issue -, Pages 180-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.102

Keywords

Karst; Fire; Hydrograph analysis; Groundwater

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Linkage [LP13010017]
  2. Land & Water Australia grant [ANU52]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of wildfire on surface soil and hydrology has been widely investigated, while its impact on the karst vadose zone is still poorly understood. A moderate to severe experimental fire was conducted on a plot (10 m x 10 m) above the shallow Wildman's Cave at Wombeyan Caves, New South Wales, Australia in May 2016. Continuous sampling of water stable isotopes, inorganic geochemistry and drip rates were conducted from Dec 2014 to May 2017. After the fire, drip discharge patterns were significantly altered, which is interpreted as the result of increased preferential flows and decreased diffuse flows in the soil. Post-fire drip water delta O-18 decreased by 6.3% in the first month relative to the average pre-fire isotopic composition. Post-fire monitoring showed an increase in drip water delta O-18 in the following six months. Bedrock related solutes (calcium, magnesium, strontium) decreased rapidly after the fire due to reduced limestone dissolution time and potentially reduced soil CO2. Soil-and ash-derived solutes (boron, lead, potassium, sodium, silicon, iodine and iron) all decreased after the fire due to volatilisation at high temperatures, except for SO42-. This is the first study to understand the hydrological impact from severe fires conducted on a karst system. It provides new insights on the cave recharge process, with a potential explanation for the decreased delta O-18 in speleothem-based fire study, and also utilise the decreased bedrock solutes to assess the wildfire impacts both in short and long time scales. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available