4.5 Article

Comparing the potential of different strategies for colour tuning in thin film photovoltaic technologies

Journal

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 823-835

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2018.1530050

Keywords

Organic solar cells; hybrid perovskite solar cells; solar cell colour; photovoltaic colour prediction; refractive index

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [MAT2015-70850-P (HIBRI2)]
  2. EURECAT, Centre Tecnologic de Catalunya
  3. European Research Council [ERC CoG648901]
  4. Spanish Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence [SEV-2015-0496]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While the performance of some emerging solar cell technologies is rocketing, there are other important parameters that also need to be considered for industrialization, including aesthetics, payback time or long-term stability. More specifically, aesthetical features of the solar cells play a very important role in the path towards the integration of these semi-transparent technologies into the buildings and windows of the future. In this work, we have implemented a theoretical methodology to study in depth colour tuning in polymer-based organic photovoltaic cells that uses experimentally complex refractive indices. We compare quantitatively basic interference effects (through active layer thickness), binaries with different donors and different acceptors, and ternary systems where the third component is either active or a simple dye. For hybrid perovskite solar cells, we compare the colour tuning capability of blending and alloying. Additionally, we show that the same theoretical framework can be employed for the so-called inverse problem, i.e. determining the best solar cell parameters (specific materials, donor: acceptor ratio and photoactive film thickness) that can reproduce a desired set of chromaticity coordinates. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available