4.7 Article

Control of grain boundary connectivity based on fractal analysis for improvement of intergranular corrosion resistance in SUS316L austenitic stainless steel

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 397-405

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.075

Keywords

Grain boundary connectivity; lntergranular corrosion; Fractal analysis; Grain boundary engineering; Austenitic stainless steel

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [26420709]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26420709] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The connectivity of high energy random boundaries was investigated on the basis of the fractal analyses of grain boundary microstructures in SUS316L stainless steel, to prove the usefulness of a refined approach to grain boundary engineering (GBE) for more precise prediction and control of intergranular corrosion in polycrystalline materials. It was found that the maximum connectivity for random boundary network, termed the maximum random boundary connectivity (MRBC) had a fractal nature in the studied specimens of SUS316L stainless steel. The fractal dimension of MRBC tended to decrease with decreasing fraction of random boundaries, or in other words with increasing fraction of low-energy low-Sigma coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries. The lower coefficient of variation of grain size distribution suggesting a more homogeneous grain structure, was found to result in the lower fractal dimension of MRBC for the specimens with a similar grain boundary character distribution (GBCD). The optimum grain boundary microstructure for enhanced intergranular corrosion resistance in the SUS316L stainless steel was discussed based on the results from the fractal analyses of MRBC for different grain boundary microstructures. (C) 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available