4.7 Article

Variations of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Heated Granite After Rapid Cooling with Liquid Nitrogen

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 2123-2139

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-018-1727-3

Keywords

Rapid cooling; Rock damage; Liquid nitrogen; Physical and mechanical property; Cryogenic fracturing

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51725404]
  2. 111' project of China [110000203920170063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine the effect of liquid nitrogen (LN2) cooling on the damage of heated rock, we conducted a series of physical and mechanical tests on Shandong granite samples. These granites were first slowly heated to the target temperatures (25600 degrees C) and held for 10h, followed by rapid cooling with a coolant. Three coolants were used and compared in our experiment: air, water and LN2. Physical properties and mechanical properties were tested after thermal treatments. Microstructural changes were also observed using scanning electron microscope and optical microscope. According to experimental results, permeability of the heated granites increases significantly after LN2-cooling, while density, P-wave velocity, strength and elastic modulus reduce. As heating temperature rises, changes in these properties become more pronounced. Compared to air-cooling and water-cooling, LN2-cooling induces greater changes in the physical and mechanical properties at any target temperature. This indicates that LN2-cooling can damage the heated rocks more remarkably than the other two cooling treatments. According to microscopic analysis, inter-granular cracking is the primary failure mode during thermal treatment, and most of the inter-granular cracks distribute at the boundaries of quartz. Our results in this paper are of great value for understanding the characteristics of thermal damage induced by rapid cooling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available