4.7 Article

Crack Expansion and Fracturing Mode of Hydraulic Refracturing from Acoustic Emission Monitoring in a Small-Scale Field Experiment

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 543-553

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-018-1697-5

Keywords

Hydraulic fracturing; Refracturing; Flow rate; Granitic rock; Acoustic emission; Fracture mode

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [25249131]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25249131] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted a hydraulic fracturing (HF) experiment at a 500-m-level gallery in Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory in central Japan. We drilled a hole downward from the gallery floor and initially injected water at a flow rate of 10 mL/min in a section of 36 mm in diameter and 160 mm in length that was selected to avoid a pre-existing joint. The first breakdown (BD) occurred at 9.20 MPa, whereupon we increased the flow rate to 30 mL/min and induced a second BD in the form of refracturing at 9.79 MPa, larger than the first BD pressure. Acoustic emissions (AEs) monitored with 16 sensors in four boreholes located 1 m away from the HF hole exhibited two-dimensional distributions, which likely delineate a crack induced by the fracturing. Expansions of the regions in which AEs occurred were observed only immediately after the first and second BDs. Many AE events in other periods were distributed within the regions where AE events had already occurred. The initial motion polarities of P-waves indicate that tensile-dominant AE events occurred when the regions expanded and they were distributed primarily on the frontiers of the regions where AE events had already occurred. The experimental results suggest that increasing the injection flow rate is effective for generating new cracks in the refracturing, with the new crack expansions being induced by tensile fracturing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available