4.7 Review

Science mapping approach to assisting the review of construction and demolition waste management research published between 2009 and 2018

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 175-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.029

Keywords

Construction and demolition waste; Sustainable development; Science mapping; Waste management; Scientometric analysis; Literature review

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71573216]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2017ZR0150]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable treatments of construction and demolition (C&D) wastes have become an increasingly urgent social, environmental, and economic issue worldwide. Based on a filter of 370 articles related to C&D waste management, this review-based study adopted a science mapping approach to evaluating the recent decade's C&D waste management research. Through a three-step workflow consisting of bibliometric literature search, scientometric analysis, and qualitative discussion, this study identified the most influential journals, scholars, articles, and countries that have been active and influential in the C&D waste management research since 2009. Keyword analysis revealed the emerging research topics, such as BIM, prefabricated construction, Big Data, and Circular Economy. The follow-up discussion summarized the mainstream research areas (e.g., qualification of waste generation), discussed research gaps (e.g., integration of BIM and Big Data into C&D waste management), and proposed the framework for near-future research, such as a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of C&D waste diversion, human factors, and design and planning for waste diversion. By providing the big picture of the latest research in C&D waste management since 2009, the paper serves as a multi-disciplinary guide for practitioners and researchers to link current research areas into future trends.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available