4.7 Article

Near-optimal planning using approximate dynamic programming to enhance post-hazard community resilience management

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages 116-126

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.09.011

Keywords

Approximate dynamic programming; Combinatorial optimization; Community resilience; Electrical power network; Rollout algorithm

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ACI-1532235, ACP-1532236, CMMI-1638284]
  2. University of Colorado Boulder
  3. Colorado State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lack of a comprehensive decision-making approach at the community level is an important problem that warrants immediate attention. Network-level decision-making algorithms need to solve large-scale optimization problems that pose computational challenges. The complexity of the optimization problems increases when various sources of uncertainty are considered. This research introduces a sequential discrete optimization approach, as a decision-making framework at the community level for recovery management. The proposed mathematical approach leverages approximate dynamic programming along with heuristics for the determination of recovery actions. Our methodology overcomes the curse of dimensionality and manages multi-state, large-scale infrastructure systems following disasters. We also provide computational results showing that our methodology not only incorporates recovery policies of responsible public and private entities within the community but also substantially enhances the performance of their underlying strategies with limited resources. The methodology can be implemented efficiently to identify near-optimal recovery decisions following a severe earthquake based on multiple objectives for an electrical power network of a testbed community coarsely modeled after Gilroy, California, United States. The proposed optimization method supports risk-informed community decision makers within chaotic post-hazard circumstances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available