4.4 Article

Prediction of radon removal efficiency for a flow-through activated charcoal system and radon mitigation characteristics

Journal

RADIATION MEASUREMENTS
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 112-120

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.10.004

Keywords

Activated charcoal; Radon removal efficiency (eta); Mitigation characteristics

Funding

  1. Project of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Supervision under the China Department of Environmental Protection [DC1606, DC201704]
  2. Doctor Fund of the University of South China
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2017JJ3267]
  4. Consortium for Verification Technology under the USA Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0002534]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activated charcoal was widely used in radon researches and mitigation applications because of good adsorption ability. In the paper, a simple model that can predict radon removal efficiency (eta) for radon mitigation applications using flow-through activated charcoal system was developed based on the previous works. Experiments were conducted with a flow-through activated charcoal system to validate the model and study the influence of factors on eta. The experimental results of eta are consistent with the theory to within 4% at the flow rates of 1-3 L/min, but range from 2% to 14% at the flow rates of 4-5 L/min. The equilibrium time of radon linearly decreases with rising flow rate, and eta decreases with rising flow rate. With moisture competing with radon for adsorption sites on the activated charcoal, radon reaches the equilibrium concentration more quickly than moisture does. As relative humidity increases, eta decreases, but the radon equilibrium concentration increases. The values of eta are bigger for those smaller particle sizes with the same type of activated charcoal. The results of this paper are useful for designing activated charcoal systems at indoor environmental conditions and predicting eta for radon mitigation applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available