4.3 Review

Contribution of fat, sugar and salt to diets in the Pacific Islands: a systematic review

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages 1858-1871

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018003609

Keywords

Fat intake; Sugar intake; Salt intake; Pacific Island countries

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)/National Heart Foundation Career Development Fellowship [1082924]
  2. WHO
  3. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth)
  4. NHMRC [1115169]
  5. VicHealth
  6. NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on food policy interventions to reduce salt [1117300]
  7. NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in obesity policy and food systems [1041020]
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1082924, 1115169, 1117300] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Pacific Island countries are experiencing a high burden of diet-related non-communicable diseases; and consumption of fat, sugar and salt are important modifiable risk factors contributing to this. The present study systematically reviewed and summarized available literature on dietary intakes of fat, sugar and salt in the Pacific Islands. Design Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and GlobalHealth) were searched from 2005 to January 2018. Grey literature was also searched and key stakeholders were consulted for additional information. Study eligibility was assessed by two authors and quality was evaluated using a modified tool for assessing dietary intake studies. Results Thirty-one studies were included, twenty-two contained information on fat, seventeen on sugar and fourteen on salt. Dietary assessment methods varied widely and six different outcome measures for fat, sugar and salt intake - absolute intake, household expenditure, percentage contribution to energy intake, sources, availability and dietary behaviours - were used. Absolute intake of fat ranged from 25 center dot 4 g/d in Solomon Islands to 98 center dot 9 g/d in Guam, while salt intake ranged from 5 center dot 6 g/d in Kiribati to 10 center dot 3 g/d in Fiji. Only Guam reported on absolute sugar intake (47 center dot 3 g/d). Peer-reviewed research studies used higher-quality dietary assessment methods, while reports from national surveys had better participation rates but mostly utilized indirect methods to quantify intake. Conclusions Despite the established and growing crisis of diet-related diseases in the Pacific, there is inadequate evidence about what Pacific Islanders are eating. Pacific Island countries need nutrition monitoring systems to fully understand the changing diets of Pacific Islanders and inform effective policy interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available