4.2 Article

Gray matter volumetric study of major depression and suicidal behavior

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages 16-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.11.007

Keywords

Voxel-based morphometry; Gray matter; Suicidal behavior; Major depressive disorder

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [P50 MH090964, P50 MH062185, R01 MH040695, R01 MH093637, K08 MH079033, K08 MH085061]
  2. Egyptian Cultural and Educational Bureau, Embassy of Egypt, Washington, DC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural brain deficits are linked to risk for suicidal behavior. However, there is disagreement about the nature of these deficits, probably due to the heterogeneity of suicidal behavior in terms of the suicidal act's lethality. We hypothesized that individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and history of more lethal suicide attempts would have lower gray matter volume (GMV) of the prefrontal regions and insula compared with MDD lower-lethality attempters and MDD non-attempters. We collected structural MRI scans on 91 individuals with MDD; 11 with history of higher-lethality suicide attempts, 14 with lower-lethality attempts, and 66 were non-attempters. Differences in GMV between these three groups were examined using both regions-of-interest (ROI) and brain-wide voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analyses. Both ROI and VBM analyses showed that higher-lethality suicide attempters have greater GMV of the prefrontal cortical regions and insula, compared with the other two groups. Although this contrasts with our hypothesis, the observed larger prefrontal cortex GMV in higher-lethally suicide attempters may underlie the set of attributes observed previously in this suicidal subgroup, including enhanced suicide attempt planning, greater response inhibition, and delayed reward capabilities. Future studies should further examine the role of these brain regions in relation to suicidal intent and planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available