4.5 Review

Approaches to urinary detection of prostate cancer

Journal

PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 362-381

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0127-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  2. Urological Research Foundation
  3. NIH [U54CA199091, P50CA180995, X01HG009642]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men that ranges from low risk states amenable to active surveillance to high-risk states that can be lethal especially if untreated. There is a critical need to develop relatively non-invasive and clinically useful methods for screening, detection, prognosis, disease monitoring, and prediction of treatment efficacy. In this review, we focus on important advances as well as future efforts needed to drive clinical innovation in this area of urine biomarker research for prostate cancer detection and prognostication. Methods We provide a review of current literature on urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer. We evaluate the strengths and limitations of a variety of approaches that vary in sampling strategies and targets measured; discuss reported urine tests for prostate cancer with respect to their technical, analytical, and clinical parameters; and provide our perspectives on critical considerations in approaches to developing a urine-based test for prostate cancer. Results There has been an extensive history of exploring urine as a source of biomarkers for prostate cancer that has resulted in a variety of urine tests that are in current clinical use. Importantly, at least three tests have demonstrated high sensitivity (similar to 90%) and negative predictive value (similar to 95%) for clinically significant tumors; however, there has not been widespread adoption of these tests. Conclusions Conceptual and methodological advances in the field will help to drive the development of novel urinary tests that in turn may lead to a shift in the clinical paradigm for prostate cancer diagnosis and management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available