4.7 Article

Development of back side technology for light trapping and photon recycling in GaAs solar cells

Journal

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 163-170

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3076

Keywords

back side reflector; GaAs solar cell; open circuit voltage; photon recycling; photovoltaics; thin film solar cell

Funding

  1. CNPq-Brasil [211986/2013-5]
  2. ESA [4000104852]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we propose and realize three different design strategies to implement an optical cavity in GaAs thin film solar cells in order to confine its internal luminescence and hence to exploit photon recycling. The strategies are based on the definition of a highly reflective and very conductive back side, whereas front side light extraction is limited by total internal reflection. We show characterization results on the internal reflectivity of the back reflector and on the contact resistance at the rear side, important quantities for a good functioning of the final solar cell. First, a back side using only metal was optimized with a pure Ag layer leading to an internal reflectivity of 95.2% and a contact resistance of 1.0 x 10(-4) omega for a 1 cm(2) device. With a metal-dielectric stack at the back side and electrical contacts made by metals via point-contacts, a second approach led to averaged internal reflectivity of 98.0% and contact resistance of 1.8 x 10(-4) omega for a 1 cm(2) device. A third strategy in which a transparent conductive oxide in combination with a metal layer was used did not show the expected results in optical and electrical properties. We fabricated and characterized solar cells with the most promising back sides. When comparing with an ordinary reference GaAs solar cell, external radiative efficiency increased by factors of 150% and 90% for the thin film solar cells with pure Ag and with the metal-dielectric stack at the back side, allowing enhancements of 19 and 13 mV in V-OC, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available