4.8 Article

Catalyst discovery through megalibraries of nanomaterials

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1815358116

Keywords

combinatorial screening; catalysis; multimetallic nanoparticle synthesis; carbon nanotube growth; in situ Raman spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Sherman Fairchild Foundation, Inc.
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research Award [FA9550-16-1-0150]
  3. Air Force Research Laboratory [FA8650-15-2-5518]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research Laboratory Research Independent Research Grant [16XCOR322]
  5. National Cancer Institute of the NIH [U54CA199091]
  6. annevar Bush Faculty Fellowship Program - Basic Research Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-15-1-0043]
  8. Department of Defense through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program
  9. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental Resource NSF Grant [ECCS-1542205]
  10. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR-1720139]
  11. State of Illinois

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nanomaterial landscape is so vast that a high-throughput combinatorial approach is required to understand structure-function relationships. To address this challenge, an approach for the synthesis and screening of megalibraries of unique nanoscale features (> 10,000,000) with tailorable location, size, and composition has been developed. Polymer pen lithography, a parallel lithographic technique, is combined with an ink spray-coating method to create pen arrays, where each pen has a different but deliberately chosen quantity and composition of ink. With this technique, gradients of Au-Cu bimetallic nanoparticles have been synthesized and then screened for activity by in situ Raman spectroscopy with respect to single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) growth. Au3Cu, a composition not previously known to catalyze SWNT growth, has been identified as the most active composition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available