4.8 Article

The low but uncertain measured benefits of US water quality policy

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802870115

Keywords

water pollution; Clean Water Act; cost-benefit analysis; cost effectiveness analysis; environmental regulation

Funding

  1. US Department of Agriculture through the National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project [IOW03909, 2014-51130-22494]
  2. National Science Foundation [SES-1530494]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

US investment to decrease pollution in rivers, lakes, and other surface waters has exceeded $1.9 trillion since 1960, and has also exceeded the cost of most other US environmental initiatives. These investments come both from the 1972 Clean Water Act and the largely voluntary efforts to control pollution from agriculture and urban runoff. This paper reviews the methods and conclusions of about 20 recent evaluations of these policies. Surprisingly, most analyses estimate that these policies' benefits are much smaller than their costs; the benefit-cost ratio from the median study is 0.37. However, existing evidence is limited and undercounts many types of benefits. We conclude that it is unclear whether many of these regulations truly fail a benefit-cost test or whether existing evidence understates their net benefits; we also describe specific questions that when answered would help eliminate this uncertainty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available