4.1 Article

Early postoperative recovery after intracranial surgical procedures. Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and desflurane

Journal

ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 638-644

Publisher

ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-865020160090000010

Keywords

Sevoflurane; Desflurane; Anesthesia; Postoperative Period

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To compared the effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on early anesthesia recovery in patients undergoing to craniotomy for intracranial lesions. METHODS: After IRB approval, the study included 50 patients aged 18-70 years who had ASA physical statuses of I-II and were scheduled for intracranial surgery. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: sevoflurane and desflurane. Anaesthesia was routinely induced in all patients followed by desflurane 5%-6% or sevoflurane 1%-2%. Moreover remifentanil infusion (0.05-0.2 mcg/kg/min) was adjusted to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 20% baseline and heart rate <90 bpm. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated over time for responses to painful stimulus, eye opening, hand squeezing, extubation, orientation and time required to achieve a Modified Aldrete Score of 9-10. Parametric and non-parametric data were assessed using Student's t- and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. A p<0.05 was taken as statistically significant. RESULTS: The times to responses to painful stimuli (7.7 +/- 2.7 vs. 4.8 +/- 1.7 min.; p<0.001), emergence (9.5 +/- 2.81 vs. 6.3 +/- 2.2 min.; p<0.001), hand-squeezing (12.1 +/- 2.9 vs. 8.2 +/- 2.3 min.; p<0.001), extubation (10.1 +/- 2.87 vs. 7.1 +/- 1.6 min.; p<0.001), orientation (15.3 +/- 3.2 vs. 10.3 +/- 2.7 min.; p<0.001) and Aldrete score of 9-10 (23.3 +/- 6.1 vs. 15.8 +/- 3.8 min.; p<0.001) were significantly lower with desflurane-based anaesthesia vs. sevoflurane-based anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Desflurane yields early recovery functions and facilitates early postoperative neurologic examinations of intracranial surgery patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available