4.7 Article

Effects of size and loading rate on the mechanical properties of single coral particles

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 342, Issue -, Pages 961-971

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.10.037

Keywords

Single coral particle; Crushing; Loading rate; Fragmentation mode; Fractal dimension; Fracture energy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774295, 41877260, 51808551]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2015272]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of single particle crushing tests were conducted on 400 coral particles with size ranges of 3-5 mm, 6.5-8.5 mm and 10-12 mm at loading rates of 0.1-50 mm/min. The effects of size and loading rate on the mechanical properties are assessed in terms of the frequency distribution of crushing strength, fragmentation mode, fractal dimension, and fracture energy density. It is proved that the crushing strength frequency distribution perfectly follows the Weibull statistics law, decreasing with an exponent of -0.286. A satisfying rate dependent equation is proposed to account for the characteristic tensile strength enhancement regarding strain rate. The fragmentation behaviour in conjunction with monitored load-displacement curves were classified into four typical modes. As the size decreases, the fragmentation mode changes from asperities breaking and surface grinding to primary brittle splitting. A higher applied loading rate may lead to an increasing possibility of major splitting occurrence. The fractal dimension is 2356 for coral particles, which is a bit larger than that of quartz sands and was found to be proportional to the natural logarithm of the strain rate. The fracture energy density tends to decrease as the particle size increases while to increase with increasing stain rates. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available