4.6 Article

Fluconazole induces ROS in Cryptococcus neoformans and contributes to DNA damage in vitro

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208471

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH AREA [1R15 AI119801-01]
  2. NIH [1P20GM109094-01A1]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM109094] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pathogenic basidiomycetous yeast, Cryptococcus neoformans, causes fatal meningitis in immunocompromised individuals. Fluconazole (FLC) is a fungistatic drug commonly administered to treat cryptococcosis. Unfortunately, FLC-resistant strains characterized by various degree of chromosomal instability were isolated from clinical patients. Importantly, the underlying mechanisms that lead to chromosomal instability in FLC-treated C. neoformans remain elusive. Previous studies in fungal and mammalian cells link chromosomal instability to the reactive oxygen species (ROS). This study provides the evidence that exposure of C. neoformans to FLC induces accumulation of intracellular ROS, which correlates with plasma membrane damage. FLC caused transcription changes of oxidative stress related genes encoding superoxide dismutase (SOD1), catalase (CAT3), and thioredoxin reductase (TRR1). Strikingly, FLC contributed to an increase of the DNA damage in vitro, when complexed with iron or copper in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Strains with isogenic deletion of copper response protein metallothionein were more susceptible to FLC. Addition of ascorbic acid (AA), an anti-oxidant at 10 mM, reduced the inhibitory effects of FLC. Consistent with potential effects of FLC on DNA integrity and chromosomal segregation, FLC treatment led to elevated transcription of RAD54 and repression of cohesin-encoding gene SCC1. We propose that FLC forms complexes with metals and contributes to elevated ROS, which may lead to chromosomal instability in C. neoformans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available