4.7 Article

Mesophyll cells' ability to maintain potassium is correlated with drought tolerance in tea (Camellia sinensis)

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 196-203

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.01.020

Keywords

Drought; K+ channels; K+ fluxes; Mesophyll K+ retention; Tea plant

Categories

Funding

  1. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization at Anhui Agricultural University [SKLTOF20170112]
  2. Science Foundation for Anhui Province [KJ2017A126]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31800583]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tea plant is an important economic crop and is vulnerable to drought. A good understanding of tea drought tolerance mechanisms is required for breeding robust drought tolerant tea varieties. Previous studies showed mesophyll cells' ability to maintain K+ is associated with its stress tolerance. Here, in this study, 12 tea varieties were used to investigate the role of mesophyll K+ retention ability towards tea drought stress tolerance. A strong and negative correlation (R-2 = 0.8239, P < 0.001) was found between PEG (mimic drought stress)-induced K+ efflux from tea mesophyll cells and overall drought tolerance in 12 tea varieties. In agreement with this, a significantly higher retained leaf K+ content was found in drought tolerant than the sensitive tea varieties. Furthermore, exogenous applied K+ (5 mM) significantly alleviated drought-induced symptom in tea plants, further supporting our finding that mesophyll K+ retention is an important component for drought tolerance mechanisms in tea plants. Moreover, pharmacological experiments showed that the contribution of K+ outward rectifying channels and non-selective cation channels in controlling PEG-induced K+ efflux from mesophylls cells are varied between drought tolerant and sensitive tea varieties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available