4.8 Article

Recursive Paleohexaploidization Shaped the Durian Genome

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue 1, Pages 209-219

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00921

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2016YFD0101001]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31371282, 31510333, 31661143009]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [C2015209069]
  4. Graduate Student Innovation Fund of North China University of Science and Technology [2018S42]
  5. Tangshan Key Laboratory Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The durian (Durio zibethinus) genome has recently become available, and analysis of this genome reveals two paleopolyploidization events previously inferred as shared with cotton (Gossypium spp.). Here, we reanalyzed the durian genome in comparison with other well-characterized genomes. We found that durian and cotton were actually affected by different polyploidization events: hexaploidization in durian; similar to 19-21 million years ago (mya) and decaploidization in cotton; similar to 13-14 mya. Previous interpretations of shared polyploidization events may have resulted from the elevated evolutionary rates in cotton genes due to the decaploidization and insufficient consideration of the complexity of plant genomes. The decaploidization elevated evolutionary rates of cotton genes by; similar to 64% compared to durian and explained a previous; similar to 4-fold over dating of the event. In contrast, the hexaploidization in durian did not prominently elevate gene evolutionary rates, likely due to its long generation time. Moreover, divergent evolutionary rates probably explain 98.4% of reconstructed phylogenetic trees of homologous genes being incongruent with expected topology. The findings provide further insight into the roles played by polypoidization in the evolution of genomes and genes, and they suggest revisiting existing reconstructed phylogenetic trees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available