4.7 Article

Phosphorus uptake of rice plants is affected by phosphorus forms and physicochemical properties of tropical weathered soils

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 435, Issue 1-2, Pages 27-38

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3869-1

Keywords

Hedley fractionation; Nutrient omission trial; Phosphorus uptake; Rice; Sub-Saharan Africa

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)/Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsPhosphorus (P) deficiency is a major constraint for rice production in the tropics. Field-specific P management is key for resource-limited farmers to increase yields with minimal inputs. We used soil P fractionation analysis to identify the relevant factors controlling P uptake and the responses to P fertilization of rice in flooded and highly weathered soils.MethodsPhytometric pot-based experiments and a modified Hedley fractionation analysis were repeated for soils from extensive regions and from geographically adjacent fields in Madagascar.ResultsLarge field-to-field variations in indigenous P supply from soils (total P uptake of rice when P is omitted) and fertilizer-P recovery efficiencies (increased P uptake when P is applied) were observed not only for soils with various geological backgrounds but also for soils from adjacent fields. Regression models indicated that the indigenous P supply in soils was largely controlled by readily available inorganic and organic P pools (r(2)=0.72), whereas fertilizer-P recovery efficiencies were controlled by the abundance of oxalate-extractable aluminum and iron in soils (r(2)=0.81).ConclusionsSpatial heterogeneity even within adjacent fields leads to benefits from field-specific fertilizer management based on indigenous P supply from soils and fertilizer-P recovery efficiencies evaluated by different soil properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available