4.7 Article

Imaging and functional characterization of crop root systems using spectroscopic electrical impedance measurements

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 435, Issue 1-2, Pages 201-224

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3867-3

Keywords

SIP; EIS; EIT; Root systems; Laboratory; Diurnal cycle

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KE 1138/1-1, SFB/TR 32]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aimsNon- or minimally invasive methods are urgently needed to characterize and monitor crop root systems to foster progress in phenotyping and general system understanding. Electrical methods have come into focus due to their unique sensitivity to various structural and functional root characteristics. The aim of this study is to highlight imaging capabilities of these methods with regard to crop root systems and to investigate changes in electrical signals caused by physiological reactions.MethodsSpectral electrical impedance tomography (sEIT) and electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were used in three laboratory experiments to characterize oilseed root systems embedded in nutrient solution. Two experiments imaged the root extension with sEIT, including one experiment monitoring a nutrient stress situation. In the third experiment electrical signatures were observed over the diurnal cycle using EIS.ResultsRoot system extension was imaged using sEIT under static conditions. During continuous nutrient deprivation, electrical polarization signals decreased steadily. Systematic changes were observed over the diurnal cycle, indicating further sensitivity to associated physiological processes. Spectral parameters suggest polarization processes at the m scale.ConclusionsElectrical imaging methods are able to non-invasively characterize crop root systems in controlled laboratory conditions, thereby offering links to root structure and function. The methods have the potential to be upscaled to the field scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available