4.2 Review

How Individual Variation in Host Tolerance Affects Competence to Transmit Parasites

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ZOOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 49-57

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/701169

Keywords

behavior; competence; disease; resilience; transmission

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation-Division of Integrative Organismal Systems grant [1257773]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1257773] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tolerance, or the maintenance of host health or fitness at a given parasite burden, has often been studied in evolutionary and medical contexts, particularly with respect to effects on the evolution of parasite virulence and individual patient outcomes. These bodies of work have provided insight about tolerance for evolutionary phenomena (e.g., virulence) and individual health (e.g., recovering from an infection). However, due to the specific motivations of that work, few studies have considered the ecological ramifications of variation in tolerance, namely, how variation in forms of tolerance could mediate parasite movement through populations and even community-level disease dynamics. Tolerance is most commonly regarded as the relationship between host fitness and parasite burden. However, few if any studies have actually quantified host fitness, instead utilizing proxies of fitness as the response variables to be regressed against parasite burden. Here, we address how attention to the effects of parasite burden on traits that are relevant to host competence (i.e., the ability to amplify parasites to levels transmissible to other hosts/vectors) will enhance our understanding of disease dynamics in nature. We also provide several forms of guidance for how to overcome the challenges of quantifying tolerance in wild organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available