4.4 Article

Stimulated backscatter of laser light from BigFoot hohlraums on the National Ignition Facility

Journal

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5079234

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. agency of the United States government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high implosion velocity, high adiabat BigFoot design [Casey et al., Phys. Plasmas 25, 056308 (2018)] has produced the highest neutron yield to date in an ignition hohlraum on the National Ignition Facility. It has used up to 500 TW of peak power and nearly 2MJ of laser energy in pulses up to 8 ns in duration, with the goal of fielding controlled implosions with high coupled energy, which can suppress deleterious hydrodynamic instabilities. However, when the laser pulse exceeds 6 ns with the laser energy greater than 1.6 MJ, stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) reaches levels that may damage optical components in the laser. Pending development of techniques to reduce SBS, limitation of laser power, and energy to avoid damage prevents the full exploitation of this approach to ignition. In this manuscript, we present three-dimensional simulations that match the experimentally measured SBS energy, in particular, reproducing quantitatively the time in the pulse when maximum backscatter occurs, and its magnitude across similar to 10 BigFoot experiments. The demonstrated robustness of the modeling, which combines LASNEX and pF3D simulations, motivates us to explore and recommend several feasible SBS mitigation strategies: modified laser pointing, different laser frequencies for each cone of beams, increased laser bandwidth on all or some of the cones, and materials with a mixture of light and heavy atoms lining the inside of the hohlraum walls. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available