4.8 Article

Heavy Physics Contributions to Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay from QCD

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 121, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.172501

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy through an INCITE award [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. NVIDIA Corporation (MAC)
  3. DFG
  4. NSFC
  5. RIKEN SPDR fellowship
  6. Leverhulme Trust
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science: Office of Nuclear Physics
  8. Office of Advanced Scientific Computing
  9. Nuclear Physics Double Beta Decay Topical Collaboration
  10. DOE Early Career Award Program
  11. LLNL Livermore Graduate Scholar Program
  12. U.S. Department of Energy by LLNL [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  13. U.S. Department of Energy by LBNL [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  14. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY15-15738, NSF PHY-1748958]
  15. LLNL Multiprogrammatic and Institutional Computing program through a Tier 1 Grand Challenge award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observation of neutrinoless double beta decay, a lepton number violating process that has been proposed to clarify the nature of neutrino masses, has spawned an enormous world-wide experimental effort. Relating nuclear decay rates to high-energy, beyond the standard model (BSM) physics requires detailed knowledge of nonperturbative QCD effects. Using lattice QCD, we compute the necessary matrix elements of short-range operators, which arise due to heavy BSM mediators, that contribute to this decay via the leading order pi(-) -> pi(+) exchange diagrams. Utilizing our result and taking advantage of effective field theory methods will allow for model-independent calculations of the relevant two-nucleon decay, which may then be used as input for nuclear many-body calculations of the relevant experimental decays. Contributions from short-range operators may prove to be equally important to, or even more important than, those from long-range Majorana neutrino exchange.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available