Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Self-testing of Pauli observables for device-independent entanglement certification
Joseph Bowles et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2018)
Device-independent certification of two bits of randomness from one entangled bit and Gisin's elegant Bell inequality
Ole Andersson et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2018)
Simulating Positive-Operator-Valued Measures with Projective Measurements
Michal Oszmaniec et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2017)
Measurement-device-independent entanglement and randomness estimation in quantum networks
Ivan Supic et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2017)
Better local hidden variable models for two-qubit Werner states and an upper bound on the Grothendieck constant KG(3)
Flavien Hirsch et al.
QUANTUM (2017)
Resource-Efficient Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witness
E. Verbanis et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2016)
General Method for Constructing Local Hidden Variable Models for Entangled Quantum States
D. Cavalcanti et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2016)
Algorithmic Construction of Local Hidden Variable Models for Entangled Quantum States
Flavien Hirsch et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2016)
Optimal randomness certification from one entangled bit
Antonio Acin et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2016)
Sufficient criterion for guaranteeing that a two-qubit state is unsteerable
Joseph Bowles et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2016)
Local hidden-variable models for entangled quantum states
R. Augusiak et al.
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL (2014)
Using complete measurement statistics for optimal device-independent randomness evaluation
O. Nieto-Silleras et al.
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS (2014)
Bell nonlocality
Nicolas Brunner et al.
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS (2014)
Entanglement verification and steering when Alice and Bob cannot be trusted
Eric G. Cavalcanti et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2013)
Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witnesses for All Entangled Quantum States
Cyril Branciard et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2013)
Robust self-testing of the singlet
M. McKague et al.
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL (2012)
Imperfect measurement settings: Implications for quantum state tomography and entanglement witnesses
Denis Rosset et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2012)
Nonlocality Tests Enhanced by a Third Observer
Daniel Cavalcanti et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2012)
All Entangled Quantum States Are Nonlocal
Francesco Buscemi
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2012)
Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution
Hoi-Kwong Lo et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2012)
Quantum networks reveal quantum nonlocality
Daniel Cavalcanti et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2011)
Device-Independent Tests of Classical and Quantum Dimensions
Rodrigo Gallego et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2010)
Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks
Stefano Pironio et al.
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS (2009)
Entanglement detection
Otfried Guehne et al.
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS (2009)
Quantum entanglement
Ryszard Horodecki et al.
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS (2009)
Noise robustness of the nonlocality of entangled quantum states
Mafalda L. Almeida et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2007)
Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
H. M. Wiseman et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2007)
Genuine tripartite entangled states with a local hidden-variable model
Geza Toth et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2006)
Entanglement swapping of noisy states: A kind of superadditivity in nonclassicality
A Sen et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2005)
Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality
J Barrett
PHYSICAL REVIEW A (2002)
Share Paper
