4.5 Editorial Material

Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges Introduction

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0080

Keywords

artificial intelligence; law; ethics; technology; governance; culture

Funding

  1. Privacy and Trust Stream-Social lead of the PETRAS Internet of Things research hub
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/N023013/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/N023013/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Alan Turing Institute [TU/C/000005] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper is the introduction to the special issue entitled: 'Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly permeates every aspect of our society, from the critical, like urban infrastructure, law enforcement, banking, healthcare and humanitarian aid, to the mundane like dating. AI, including embodied AI in robotics and techniques like machine learning, can improve economic, social welfare and the exercise of human rights. Owing to the proliferation of AI in high-risk areas, the pressure is mounting to design and govern AI to be accountable, fair and transparent. How can this be achieved and through which frameworks? This is one of the central questions addressed in this special issue, in which eight authors present in-depth analyses of the ethical, legal-regulatory and technical challenges posed by developing governance regimes for AI systems. It also gives a brief overview of recent developments in AI governance, how much of the agenda for defining AI regulation, ethical frameworks and technical approaches is set, as well as providing some concrete suggestions to further the debate on AI governance. This article is part of the theme issue 'Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal, and technical opportunities and challenges'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available