4.4 Article

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and rituximab: may we predict circulating B lymphocytes recovery?

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 529-532

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-018-4139-4

Keywords

Nephrotic syndrome; Rituximab; Children; B cell depletion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundRituximab (RTX) has been shown to be an efficient treatment for steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). A long B cell depletion period seems to improve the duration of remission. This study reports the duration of B cell depletion after each RTX infusion in patients with nephrotic syndrome.MethodsWe retrospectively report the data of 22 patients with a diagnosis of a SDNS or steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) and a treatment with RTX in a single center. B cell depletion duration was compared to the first B cell depletion duration and to the previous B cell depletion duration in each patient.ResultsTwenty-two patients (5 girls) were included. Seventy-six periods of B cell depletions were compared to the first B cell depletion duration and to the preceding B cell depletion duration in the same patient. Total duration of B cell depletion was 26 (6-66) months. Individual post-RTX infusion B cell depletion duration was 5.1 (1.6-14) months. Median B cell depletion duration following the first RTX cure for children who had received 1 to 2 infusions at first cure was not statistically different of those who had received 3 to 4 infusions (p=0.18). Comparing the B cell depletion induced by previous RTX courses and the following B cell depletion, 89.5% of patients had a similar duration within an open interval from 2months.ConclusionOnce the individual time interval until B cell recovery is determined, monitoring could be individualized by targeting the expected date of B cell recovery or by performing pre-emptive RTX injections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available